Monday, July 7, 2008

Teaser Questions

Hello! Here are some teaser questions about Eat, Pray, Love by Elizabeth Gilbert (our book for the next club meeting tomorrow night.) For those of you reading along from afar, our next meeting will be on a houseboat on the Mississippi! How fun will that be?! So, anyway, send your questions, thoughts, responses to me via post and I'll take them along with me tomorrow. Here are the questions from the Penguin Reading Guide.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

1. Gilbert writes that “the appreciation of pleasure can be the anchor of humanity,” making the argument that America is “an entertainment-seeking nation, not necessarily a pleasure-seeking one.” Is this a fair assessment?

2. After imagining a petition to God for divorce, an exhausted Gilbert answers her phone to news that her husband has finally signed. During a moment of quietude before a Roman fountain, she opens her Louise Glück collection to a verse about a fountain, one reminiscent of the Balinese medicine man’s drawing. After struggling to master a 182-verse daily prayer, she succeeds by focusing on her nephew, who suddenly is free from nightmares. Do these incidents of fortuitous timing signal fate? Cosmic unity? Coincidence?

3. Gilbert hashes out internal debates in a notebook, a place where she can argue with her inner demons and remind herself about the constancy of self-love. When an inner monologue becomes a literal conversation between a divided self, is this a sign of last resort or of self-reliance?

4. When Gilbert finally returns to Bali and seeks out the medicine man who foretold her return to study with him, he doesn’t recognize her. Despite her despair, she persists in her attempts to spark his memory, eventually succeeding. How much of the success of Gilbert’s journey do you attribute to persistence?

5. Prayer and meditation are both things that can be learned and, importantly, improved. In India, Gilbert learns a stoic, ascetic meditation technique. In Bali, she learns an approach based on smiling. Do you think the two can be synergistic? Or is Ketut Liyer right when he describes them as “same-same”?

6. Gender roles come up repeatedly in Eat, Pray, Love, be it macho Italian men eating cream puffs after a home team’s soccer loss, or a young Indian’s disdain for the marriage she will be expected to embark upon at age eighteen, or the Balinese healer’s sly approach to male impotence in a society where women are assumed responsible for their childlessness. How relevant is Gilbert’s gender?

7. In what ways is spiritual success similar to other forms of success? How is it different? Can they be so fundamentally different that they’re not comparable?

8. Do you think people are more open to new experiences when they travel? And why?

9. Abstinence in Italy seems extreme, but necessary, for a woman who has repeatedly moved from one man’s arms to another’s. After all, it’s only after Gilbert has found herself that she can share herself fully in love. What does this say about her earlier relationships?

10. Gilbert mentions her ease at making friends, regardless of where she is. At one point at the ashram, she realizes that she is too sociable and decides to embark on a period of silence, to become the Quiet Girl in the Back of the Temple. It is just after making this decision that she is assigned the role of ashram key hostess. What does this say about honing one’s nature rather than trying to escape it? Do you think perceived faults can be transformed into strengths rather than merely repressed?

11. Sitting in an outdoor café in Rome, Gilbert’s friend declares that every city—and every person—has a word. Rome’s is “sex,” the Vatican’s “power”; Gilbert declares New York’s to be “achieve,” but only later stumbles upon her own word, antevasin, Sanskrit for “one who lives at the border.” What is your word? Is it possible to choose a word that retains its truth for a lifetime?

Deep and really intriguing, eh? Looking forward to hearing what you have to say!

1 comment:

julie said...

Hello, Sarah! Thanks for posting the questions. I just finished the book this afternoon, so the timing was perfect. But I have to say that it was definitely not one of my favorite books.

To begin with the positive, I think the one thing I will take away from this book (in terms of personal application) was the idea that emotional breakdowns can become a habit (mentioned on page 148). This brought to mind the Bible verse regarding bringing every thought in obedience to Christ. Something about the presentation of the idea in the book very much spoke to me! I also loved seeing the power of forgiveness in her life, and being reminded of the importance of accepting ourselves, ugly parts and all. Finally, I liked reading about her experience as Key Hostess; specifically, that we can use our unique gifts to bless others and that there is room for that freedom in our lives. As a chatty gal myself, I often have to remember that truth.

However, overall, I found the book to be slow and somewhat indulgent (both in subject and writing). Her entire journey is based around herself, although she does seem to branch out more in Bali. The indulgence extends to subject matter in the way that she has created her own representation of religions, yoga, meditation, etc. to fit her worldview. Although I can agree that we all must do this to some extent, this sort of cultural relativism is easy and somewhat empty. I myself have been challenged to allow for freedom in my own life and in the lives of others, but I still believe that there is a higher authority than my own mind. Choosing to accept those doctrines which only make me comfortable and "happy" leads me to a God who is fully comprehendible (something which Gilbert herself seems to be set against). Her pantheistic view matches up well with her experience. Although the book does chronicle her experiences and her spiritual search, I didn't enjoy "watching" it happen because it all felt so privileged to me. She had the money, the means, and the freedom to take this time. But what of those who do not have such luxuries? On page 260 she states that she had never felt "less burdened by myself or by the world." To me, she has become so simplistic in her views by the end of the book that it has ceased to be interesting or useful. On page 329, at the conclusion of the book, she states that she realizes the ending is like the "page out of some housewife's dream." And to me, this statement simply feels elitist.

To be fair, I realize that she didn't intend to write a religious manual, and I do believe that we should all be in the process of transformation: that tomorrow I would have more mercy, more kindness, and more love than today. Perhaps transformation is my "word" - I pray that it would be. But for me, that transformation become empty the moment it exists only for my self-gratification and my happiness.

I did love that the book allowed me to think through and clarify some of my own opinions. And it definitely makes me want to travel! Overall, I just wasn't interested in her story. Two themes that I love to see in literature are sacrifice and redemption. And I think that, for me, I didn't feel those themes coming through in this book.

Have fun on the boat tomorrow! I'll be interested to hear how the discussion goes.